People
Two hundred and twelve adults in heterosexual relationships (106 women, Myears = years; 106 men, Mage age = years) and two hundred and eight adults in same-gender relationships (72 couples self-identified as gay: Mage = 34.1 years; 72 couples self-identified as lesbian: Mage = 33.3 years years). Couples were required to have been together romantically for a minimum of 6 months and to come to the lab with their partner to participate in the study. The average relationship length for all couples was 4.8 years (SD = 6.6 years). Exclusion criteria limited participation to individuals currently without serious, chronic health problems or any health issues (e.g., diabetes) that affected their eating behaviors. (If participants engaged in disordered eating behaviors but did not conceptualize them as disordered, they may have participated).
The participants inside heterosexual dating had been mostly European Western (72% Eu American, 10% Dark colored, 8% Hispanic/Latino, 7% Far eastern Western, and you will 3% “other”). Members claimed personal income from inside the ranges: “ $75,000” (1%). Simultaneously, 41.1% stated that these people were dating and never cohabitating, thirty-two.4% stated that they certainly were cohabitating (coping with each other), and 26.5% stated that they were married.
The participants inside the lgbt relationships was indeed and mainly European-Western (70%; 14% Ebony, 10% Hispanic/Latino, 3% Western American, 3% “other”). People advertised individual earnings in ranges: “ 0 means specific amount of dissatisfaction. The exam–retest precision for it size might have been considered to be a great [0.79; (33)], and therefore measure has been seen for predictive authenticity [age.grams., it’s on the lbs status and you may dietary routines various other adult trials; (34, 35)].
Relationships Quality
The latest Relationship Relations Questionnaire [MIS; (36)] was utilized to evaluate participants’ relationship quality. It 15-product measure consists of one or two subscales away from like and you may dispute. This new like scale queried participants having fun with 10 points and “Exactly how the time could you feel toward your ex lover?” The new conflict scale queried people having fun with five activities plus “How often could you along with your lover argue with one another?” For each and every items try ranked on the an effective 9-part Likert level out-of 0 = kissbrides.com web site here “not” to 8 = “very much.” Facts determining dispute was indeed opposite coded (thus examining “harmony”) and you will a complete element get out of relationships quality is determined. The first format of the MIS was created to determine partnered couples’ matchmaking high quality; the latest size is modified for this study to see “significant other” and you can “lover,” unlike “lover.” The new MIS try reputable across the subsamples regarding partners (?s = 0.77–0.89) and it has already been made use of properly various other degree out of same-sex partners, revealing predictive validity [e.g., (19)].
Relationships Size
Members said their relationship duration of the answering: “For how almost a year could you be consistently involved in your close partner?” Email address details are displayed in many years for smoother interpretation.
Covariates
Analyses noticed covariates more than likely for the putting on weight and you can dating position: many years, participants’ gender (coded ?step 1 = male, step one = female), and sexual orientation. (Gender and you will sexual orientation and additionally was indeed regarded as moderators during the analyses).
Analytical Package
SPSS variation twenty-eight and HLM version eight were utilized to have descriptive analyses and sample research seeks. Investigation was indeed appeared for completeness; the level of lost analysis towards people varying included in analyses ranged regarding 0 to one.4%. Listwise deletion was applied having forgotten research. So you’re able to account for this new non-versatility of data from somebody nested within dating, multilevel modeling was utilized to test to own gender and you may sexual positioning differences in inside-lovers details and also to decide to try data seeks (37). Continued details was in fact class indicate depending at the top step one (within-couples) and you will grand mean depending within top dos (between-couples).